Revolving door layout with rectangular node for speed restriction A Rectangular Node with speed restriction enabled should be handy here. This area is indicated by the dashed blue rectangle in the screenshot below. Since revolving doors rotate slower than people usually move, you need to find a way to slow down the pedestrians in the whole revolving door area. Revolving door pedestrian layout with pathways It will prevent them from colliding and creating further gridlock. Furthermore, it makes sense to use an additional wall to separate these pathways and pedestrian flows. It’s especially convenient to use AnyLogic Pathway markup element to model pedestrian flows as you can direct pedestrians where you need them to go. Since there’s a two-way flow, it’s better to make sure they’re separated, as it would be in a real revolving door. It’s important to understand that both in and out flows are taken into account, which means there should be a maximum of 50 people entering and 50 people exiting per minute. Let’s say you’re modeling a revolving door with a throughput of 100 people per minute. For example, if such a doorway is supposed to allow for 100 people per minute, it’s better to apply the right modeling approach to a pedestrian model so that there is no congestion. This is why it’s so important to consider how much throughput revolving doors can provide when modeling them. However, the original and more important purpose of the revolving door, as a pedestrian flow management solution remains. Less energy required to maintain the climate means a reduction in the carbon footprint of the building. Opening a regular door allows a large amount of air to escape, but with the always open-always closed principle of revolving doors, drafts, dust, and noise coming into the building are greatly reduced. Our findings may be useful in identifying topics for future studies on real human crowd movement, exit design, and facility layout.Revolving doors offer the ideal solution for convenience and security as well as energy efficiency. Our experiment did not directly test the behavior in real evacuations but emphasized the role of different designs in real human decision making in a virtual environment.

The escape route of pedestrians under the outward-opening door condition resembled the letter “Z”. The aisle width was reduced under the outward-opening door condition, and a bottleneck was formed. When inward-opening doors are used, the escape path is consistent with the exit direction. In comparison with outward-opening doors, inward-opening doors had a definite advantage in terms of evacuation efficiency, area density, and space utilization. The movement of pedestrians to the middle position affected the traffic capacity of the aisle. The aisle center was used more than the sides.

Therefore, the exit width of 1.1 m was the most advantageous in terms of evacuation time and construction cost. Results indicated that at an exit width of 1.1 m, the evacuation time was at a low-rising shock steady state with a normal crowd size. Evacuation efficiency, bottleneck area density, escape route characteristics, and similar factors were analyzed on the basis of different exit widths and operating doors. Considering the differences in the individual characteristics of pedestrians and the influence factors of buildings, we proposed a safety evacuation model for limited spaces.

Norman doors anylogic